Martina Navratilova called on San Jose State University to fire women’s volleyball coach Todd Kress on 2 July 2026, citing a former player’s 1998 abuse allegations that resurfaced in a Fox News Digital report.
What sparked Navratilova’s outcry?
Navratilova re‑shared an X post by Olympic swimmer Nancy Hogshead, condemning Kress and demanding immediate action. She wrote, “Fire his a—!” and added that the situation was “truly sickening.” The post amplified Hogshead’s claim that Kress mishandled a female and a trans athlete during his first two seasons at SJSU.
What are the allegations?
In October 2024, SJSU’s athletic department received a letter from a former Fairfield University player who played under Kress in 1998. The letter described a hotel‑room assault after Fairfield’s loss to Clemson in the first round of the 1998 NCAA tournament. According to the account, Kress, allegedly drunk, smeared caramel on the player’s face, forced her onto a bed, exposed himself, and later threatened to turn on a shower while she was in a bathtub. The former player said she was compelled to take a shot of liquor to secure her release.
How has SJSU responded?
Emails obtained by Fox News Digital show SJSU officials acknowledged receipt of the allegations, thanked the former player for coming forward, and apologized for her experience. Despite the acknowledgment, Kress has not been suspended and continues to lead the women’s volleyball program. The university has not issued a public statement beyond the email exchange.
Why Navratilova’s voice matters
Navratilova, a 18‑time Grand Slam champion and outspoken advocate for gender equity, often uses her platform to spotlight abuse in sports. Her demand adds pressure on SJSU, which is already navigating a high‑profile transgender athlete controversy. By aligning with Hogshead, Navratilova underscores a broader call for accountability across collegiate athletics.
What could happen next?
SJSU’s administration faces mounting scrutiny from alumni, athletes, and the public. If the university proceeds with dismissal, it would mark a rare instance of a coach being removed over decades‑old allegations. Conversely, retaining Kress could fuel further protests and potentially trigger investigations by the NCAA or state authorities. Navratilova’s involvement ensures the story remains in the national conversation.
How does this fit into Navratilova’s activism?
Beyond her tennis legacy—she amassed 167 singles titles and 31 Grand Slam doubles crowns—Navratilova has championed LGBTQ+ rights and fought against sexual misconduct. Her recent tweet aligns with past efforts, such as supporting the 2022 “Safe Sport” legislation. This episode adds another chapter to her lifelong fight for athlete safety.
What are the broader implications?
The case highlights how historic abuse claims can resurface and impact current programs. It also raises questions about institutional responsibility when past misconduct surfaces years later. As universities grapple with Title IX compliance, Navratilova’s stance may influence policy reviews and coaching vetting processes nationwide.